Legal Opinion

Joachim v. Crater Lake Lodge, Inc.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1976No. 420 787, SC 24324PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, C. J.

The plaintiffs filed this action as a class action. Defendants operate a concession at a national park. Plaintiffs allege that the defendants served contaminated food and water to plaintiffs and hundreds of others and caused them to become ill.

Pursuant to ORS 13.230, the trial court held a hearing to decide whether this proceeding could be maintained as a class action. The trial court decided it could not. Plaintiffs thereafter applied to this court, pursuant to ORS 13.400 for leave to appeal to this court from that ruling. In our discretion we denied their application. Plaintiffs now attempt…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bernard v. First National Bank of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Roemisch v. Mutual of Omaha InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Rogelstad v. Farmers Union Grain Terminal Ass'nNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Levine v. Empire Savings and Loan AssociationSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
  5. Levine v. Empire Savings and Loan AssociationColorado Court of Appeals · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Young v. CrookhamOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Russell v. SheahanOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. HattersleyOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Joarnt v. Autozone, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2007
  5. James v. PacifiCorpCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API