Legal Opinion
Rogelstad v. Farmers Union Grain Terminal Ass'n
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided November 27, 1974No. Civ. 9038PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ERICKSTAD, Chief Justice.
The appellee, Farmers Union Grain Terminal Association, has moved to dismiss an appeal taken from an order of the Ramsey County District Court.
The appellant, Harlen Rogelstad, initiated an action against the Farmers Union Grain Terminal Association, hereinafter GTA, claiming that GTA charged usurious interest rates on cash advanced to Rogel-stad under grain purchase contracts entered into between the two parties. Rogelstad further claimed that GTA violated the Federal Truth in Lending Act, 15 U.S.G. § 1601 et seq., by failing to disclose the interest rates on these…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Korn v. Franchard Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- Rollinger v. JC Penney CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1971
- Chas. F. Ellis Agency, Inc. v. BergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Bell v. Beneficial Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- In Re Baycol Cases I & IICalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- Amato v. General Motors Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1981
- Sheets v. Letnes, Marshall & Fiedler, Ltd.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
- Minch v. City of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.