State v. Hattersley
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCarson, J.
The sole issue in this case is whether a trial court’s order suppressing evidence, coming after jury selection had begun but before the jury had been impaneled and sworn, was one made “prior to trial” and therefore appealable by the state under ORS 138.060(3). 1 The Court of Appeals found the order appealable. We affirm.
The defendant was charged with the crimes of conspiracy and solicitation to commit criminal mischief, bribing a witness, tampering with a witness and attempted theft. The charges were consolidated for trial. On the day set for trial, but prior to calling the jury, the trial…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. CarusoOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- Warm Springs Irrigation Dist. v. Pacific Livestock Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1918
- Joachim v. Crater Lake Lodge, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1976
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. FergusonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- State Ex Rel. Carlile v. FrostOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. CarrilloOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- State Ex Rel. Schrunk v. BonebrakeOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. GangiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.