Legal Opinion
Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. v. St. Jude Medical, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided December 18, 2008No. Nos. 2007-1296, 2007-1347PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOURIE, Circuit Judge.
Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc., Guidant Sales Corporation, Mirowski Family Ventures, LLC, and Anna Mirowski (collectively “Cardiac” or “appellants”) appeal from the decision of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana granting summary judgment of invalidity of claim 4 of U.S. Patent 4,407,288 (“the '288 patent”). See Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. v. St. Jude Medical, Inc., 483 F.Supp.2d 734 (S.D.Ind.2007) (“Invalidity Decision”). St. Jude Medical, Inc. and Pacesetter, Inc. (collectively, “St. Jude”) cross-appeal the district court’s decision permitting…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ex Parte Sibbald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
- Joy Technologies, Inc., and A/s Niro Atomizer, Involuntary v. Flakt, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Microsoft Corp. v. At&t Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Engel Industries, Inc. v. The Lockformer Company, Iowa Precision Industries, Inc., and Met-Coil Systems Corporation, Defendants/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc., Guidant Sales Corporation, and Eli Lilly and Company v. St. Jude Medical, Inc., Pacesetter, Inc., and Ventritex, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ormco Corp. v. Align Technology, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2009
- Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. v. St. Jude Medical, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009