Legal Opinion
United States v. ABC Industries
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided August 30, 1993No. 4:92-CV-163PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERT HOLMES BELL, District Judge.
General Foods Corporation and Hoover Universal, Inc. (the “movants”) jointly seek leave to intervene in this action brought by the United States of America and the State of Michigan (the “plaintiffs”) under, among *605other things, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. § 9601 et seq., as amended. They assert that they are seeking intervention for the “limited purpose of challenging the terms of the proposed de minimis consent decree lodged with the Court on November 25, 1992.” For the reasons given…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Norman Purnell, Administrator of the Estate of Armstead Land, A/K/A Armstad Land v. City of Akron v. Damon Campbell Carissa CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- City of New York v. Exxon Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- In Re Acushnet River & New Bedford Harbor: Proceedings Re Alleged PCB PollutionDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1989
- City of New York v. Exxon Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- United States v. Akzo Coatings of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. Albert Inv. Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Aerojet General Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- State Ex Rel. Ball v. CummingsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2000
- United States v. Union Elec. Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1994
- United States v. Union Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.