Legal Opinion
United States v. Albert Inv. Co., Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided November 10, 2009No. 08-6267PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PAUL KELLY, Jr., Circuit Judge.
Movant-Appellant Union Pacific Railroad Co. (“Union Pacific”) appeals from the district court’s denial of its motion to intervene in an action brought by Plaintiffs-Appellees (United States and the State of Oklahoma) under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 9601-9675 (“CERCLA”). “[A]n order denying intervention is final and subject to immediate review if it prevents the applicant from becoming a party to the action.” WildEarth Guardians v. U.S. Forest Serv., 573 F.3d 992, 994 (10th Cir.2009) (internal…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- United States v. Pitney Bowes, Inc., Edo Corporation Plessey, Inc. Vernitron Corp., Baii Banking Corp., Movant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Utah Ass'n of Counties v. ClintonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- San Juan County, Utah v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- DeJulius v. New England Health Care Employees Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Western Energy Alliance v. ZinkeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- City of Emeryville v. The Sherwin-Williams CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Tri-State Generation & Transmission Ass'n v. New Mexico Public Regulation CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Aerojet General Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- ASARCO v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.