Legal Opinion

City of New York v. Exxon Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 24, 1986No. 85 Civ. 1939 (EW)PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EDWARD WEINFELD, District Judge.

The City of New York brings this action under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA), 1 together with various pendent state claims, against major corporations which generated and transported hazardous wastes dumped at five landfills owned and operated by the City. All defendants move to dismiss the complaint under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6); in addition, defendant Refinemet International, Inc. (‘'Refinemet”) moves to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(2).

The City’s complaint…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Marine Midland Bank, N.A. v. James W. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
  3. The State of New York v. Shore Realty Corp. And Donald LeograndeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  4. Cabell v. MarkhamCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
  5. Markham v. CabellSupreme Court of the United States · 1946

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Goodrich v. BetkoskiCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  2. Artesian Water Co. v. Government of New Castle CountyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1987
  3. City of New York v. Exxon Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
  4. Werlein v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1990
  5. City of Health, Ohio v. Ashland Oil, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1993

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API