Legal Opinion

State v. Wilson

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 18, 2000No. NonePublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GILBERTSON, Justice.

[¶ 1.] The defendants were arrested in a motel room, which was searched pursuant to a search warrant. The trial court suppressed the evidence seized as to both defendants because the judge who issued this warrant acted outside the circuit to which he had been elected. The State appeals the orders suppressing the evidence seized pursuant to an intermediate appeal granted by this Court. We affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

[¶ 2.] In the early hours of October 9, 1999, Officer Wentzel of Parkston, South Dakota, was approached by a confidential informant. The informant told Wentzel…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Poppen v. WalkerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Cummings v. MickelsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. BuchholzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. HansonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State of Tennessee v. Charlotte Lynn Frazier And Andrea ParksTennessee Supreme Court · 2018
  2. State v. HessWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
  3. United States v. LevinDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2016
  4. Breck v. JanklowSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State v. ChristensenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API