Legal Opinion
State v. Hanson
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided January 20, 1999No. NonePublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERTSON, Justice (on reassignment).
[¶ 1.] Hanson appeals her conviction for possession of marijuana claiming that 1) the police lacked probable cause to arrest her; 2) her constitutional rights were violated in obtaining a sample of her urine; and 3) there was insufficient evidence to support her conviction. We affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
[¶2.] On February 21, 1997, at approximately 10:00 p.m., Huron police stopped a car driven by J.S., age 16, for violation of the tinted window law. Pamela Hanson (Hanson), age 42, was a passenger in the front seat and M.G., age 15, a passenger in the rear…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Ybarra v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- State v. GuthrieSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. BuchholzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. FierroSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. MattsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. EngesserSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.