San Francisco Sulphur Co. v. Aetna Indemnity Co.
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. George H. Buck, Judge presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment and from an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action on an undertaking given by the defendant to discharge an attachment in an action by the plaintiff against W. P. Clark & Bro. and the Seropian Bros. Company, a corporation.
The undertaking given was the one required by section 540 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and therein the defendants in the original action, as principals, and the defendant here as surety, jointly and severally undertook that the defendants there, W. F. Clark & Bro. and the Seropian Bros. Company, would pay whatever judgment…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Lambert v. HaskellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Burkett v. GriffithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Blasingame v. Home Ins. Co. of City of N.Y.California Supreme Court · 1888
- Cushing v. PiresCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Seattle Crockery Co. v. HaleyWashington Supreme Court · 1893
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Washer v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Pue v. WheelerMontana Supreme Court · 1927
- Tormey v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
- Miller & Lux, Inc. v. San Joaquin Light & Power Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1932
- Panter v. National Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1918
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.