Panter v. National Surety Co.
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLennon, P. J.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff in an action to recover damages upon a bond given by the defendant National Surety Company.
The facts of the ease briefly stated are these: On December 21, 1910, a prior action was instituted in the superior court of Mendocino County by one Jacobs against Frank Panter, the plaintiff here, and others, in which action on the said twenty-first day of December, 1910, the court issued an order of injunction, restraining the defendants there from the commission of certain acts and prohibiting the Crocker National Bank from paying or crediting…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Burkett v. GriffithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Hibernia Savings & Loan Society v. ThorntonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Blasingame v. Home Ins. Co. of City of N.Y.California Supreme Court · 1888
- Mayor of Los Angeles v. SignoretCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
- San Francisco Sulphur Co. v. Aetna Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1909
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Russell v. United Pacific InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Webb v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Sunset Lumber Co. v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Gridley v. SelleckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Whittaker v. E. E. McCalla Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.