Northpointe Plaza v. City of Rochester
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
The trial court originally held appellant, a property owner, entitled to recover $65,-081.33 in damages, $38,925 in attorney fees, and $1,876.44 in costs and disbursements from respondent, a city, on the grounds that the city’s arbitrary denial of a conditional use permit (CUP) for appellant’s property was a violation of appellant’s right to substantive due process.and was actionable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Respondent moved for amended findings or for a new trial. Because the local federal district court had recently held that arbitrary zoning decisions are not…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Maine v. ThiboutotSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Littlefield v. City of AftonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- Snyder v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Chanhassen Estates Residents Ass'n v. City of ChanhassenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Kiges v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Moreno v. Crookston Times Printing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Citizens for a Balanced City v. Plymouth Congregational ChurchCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- Northpointe Plaza v. City of RochesterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- Boatwright v. BudakCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- Fromer v. Two Hundred Post AssociatesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.