Legal Opinion

Northpointe Plaza v. City of Rochester

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 23, 1990No. C3-89-1851PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

The trial court originally held appellant, a property owner, entitled to recover $65,-081.33 in damages, $38,925 in attorney fees, and $1,876.44 in costs and disbursements from respondent, a city, on the grounds that the city’s arbitrary denial of a conditional use permit (CUP) for appellant’s property was a violation of appellant’s right to substantive due process.and was actionable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Respondent moved for amended findings or for a new trial. Because the local federal district court had recently held that arbitrary zoning decisions are not…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Maine v. ThiboutotSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Littlefield v. City of AftonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
  3. Snyder v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  4. Chanhassen Estates Residents Ass'n v. City of ChanhassenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Kiges v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Moreno v. Crookston Times Printing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  2. Citizens for a Balanced City v. Plymouth Congregational ChurchCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
  3. Northpointe Plaza v. City of RochesterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  4. Boatwright v. BudakCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
  5. Fromer v. Two Hundred Post AssociatesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API