Legal Opinion
Citizens for a Balanced City v. Plymouth Congregational Church
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 2, 2003No. A03-190PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERT H. SCHUMACHER, Judge.
Citizens for a Balanced City and numerous individuals (collectively Citizens) appeal from the district court’s summary judgment, which found that respondent City of Minneapolis had not acted arbitrarily, capriciously, or unreasonably in granting respondent Plymouth Neighborhood Church Foundation a spacing ordinance waiver, a conditional use permit, and a maximum occupancy variance. We affirm.
FACTS
In early 2001, the Foundation, a faith-based-non-profit organization, purchased an abandoned 140-bed nursing home located at 1920 LaSalle Avenue. The Foundation…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Honn v. City of Coon RapidsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Philip Morris Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- Northwestern College v. City of Arden HillsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Chanhassen Estates Residents Ass'n v. City of ChanhassenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Oconomowoc Residential Programs, Inc. v. City of MilwaukeeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Essling's Homes Plus, Inc. v. City of Saint PaulDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2004
- In Re Matter of HildebrandtCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
- State v. CurtisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
- Randall v. PaulCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- In re the Consolidated Hospital Surcharge Appeals of Gillette Children's Specialty HealthcareCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.