Legal Opinion

State v. Foster

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 8, 1989No. 86-61472; CA A48063PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for driving under the influence of intoxicants. ORS 813.010. His only contention is that the court erred by denying his motion to suppress evidence obtained after his vehicle was stopped by a police officer. He divides his argument on this assignment into three categories: (1) the officer did not have reasonable suspicion under ORS 131.615 to justify the stop; (2) the officer lacked probable cause to arrest him; (3) he was unconstitutionally denied the right to counsel before deciding whether to perform field sobriety tests. We affirm.

The trial court issued a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. State v. NewtonOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State v. SpencerOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. RobertiOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  5. State v. DouglasOregon Supreme Court · 1971

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  2. State v. WhiteheadCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  3. State v. ArmbrusterIdaho Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. City of Roseburg v. DykstraCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  5. City of Roseburg v. DykstraCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API