City of Roseburg v. Dykstra
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1DissentWarren, J.
Because I believe our precedents compel the conclusion that defendant was entitled to have counsel present at the breath test under the facts of this case, I dissent.
After arresting defendant for driving under the influence of intoxicants, a City of Roseburg (City) police officer transported him to the Douglas County Corrections facility for a breath test. While there, defendant called a lawyer, who arrived at the facility within a short time. After consulting with his lawyer, defendant consented to take the test.1 Although he requested that his counsel be present during the test, the officer…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. SpencerOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. SparklinOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. TrenaryOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Moore v. STATE, MOTOR VEHICLES DIV., ETC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1982
- State Ex Rel. Russell v. JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.