Legal Opinion

State v. Armbruster

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided December 11, 1989No. 17700PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWANSTROM, Judge.

James Armbruster entered a conditional plea of guilty to the misdemeanor offense of driving under the influence of alcohol. I.C. § 18-8004. By entry of this conditional plea, Armbruster reserved the right to appeal the magistrate’s order denying the suppression of the blood-alcohol tests. We are asked to decide whether probable cause existed to arrest Armbruster and to request that he take a blood-alcohol test. After considering the issue, we affirm the district court’s decision upholding the magistrate’s order denying suppression of the test results.

On appeal, our review of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. AlgerIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  2. State v. CurtisIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. State v. MiddletonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Matter of NowojIdaho Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. State v. FosterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. FerreiraIdaho Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. State v. ZubizaretaIdaho Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Thompson v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. State v. Martinez-GonzalezIdaho Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Justice v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API