Legal Opinion
Differential Steel Car Co. v. MacDonald
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 17, 1950No. 10925PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McALLISTER, Circuit Judge.
Appellant contracted with the Republic of Bolivia to build two motor rail cars, according to certain specifications, for use on a government railroad in that country. The cars were built and shipped to Bolivia, but the Bolivian government refused to accept them on the ground that they did not meet specifications and warranties, and completely failed in operation.
Appellees were agents of appellant, and will hereafter be referred to as Macdonald, individually, one of the partners, whose firm bears his name. Under the laws of Bolivia, resident agents of a foreign…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Washington Gas Light Co. v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Globe Indemnity Co. v. SchmittOhio Supreme Court · 1944
- United States v. HillCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
- Scott v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1947
- United States v. IngallsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Washington v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
- Maurice J. Feil and Leo a Loeb, Individually and as Co-Partners Trading as the Enurtone Company v. Federal Trande CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- Ellsworth Strickler v. Pfister Associated Growers, Inc., a Corporation Whose Home Office is Aurora, Illinois, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963
- Berk v. Gordon Johnson CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1964
- State of Washington v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.