Johnson v. Honeywell International Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ARMSTRONG, J.
“A manufacturer is not liable to a sophisticated user of its product for failure to warn of a risk, harm, or danger, if the sophisticated user knew or should have known of that risk, harm, or danger.” (Johnson v. American Standard, Inc. (2008) 43 Cal.4th 56, 71 [74 Cal.Rptr.3d 108, 179 P.3d 905] (hereinafter, American Standard).) This is the sophisticated user defense, and it applies to negligence and strict liability warning defect claims. (Id. at p. 65.)
In this case, which comes to us after a demurrer was sustained without leave to amend, we are asked to determine…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Barker v. Lull Engineering Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
- Brown v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Elsner v. UvegesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Quiroz v. Seventh Avenue CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Chavez v. Glock, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- Das v. Bank of America, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2010
- David v. HernandezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Maxton v. Western States MetalsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Johnson v. United States Steel Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2015
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.