Maxton v. Western States Metals
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KITCHING, J.
Plaintiff John Maxton alleges he sustained personal injuries as a result of working with metal products manufactured by defendants1 and supplied to Maxton’s employer. The metal products were essentially raw materials because they could be used in innumerable ways. The issue on appeal is whether Maxton can maintain his negligence and strict liability causes of action against defendants. We hold that he cannot.
Generally suppliers of raw materials to manufacturers cannot be liable for negligence or under a strict products liability theory to the manufacturers’ employees who…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Evans v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Hammond v. North American Asbestos Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1983
- O'NEIL v. Crane Co.California Supreme Court · 2012
- Jimenez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Graham v. Bank of America, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2014
- Johnson v. United States Steel Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2015
- Thompson v. Petaluma Police Dept. CA1/4California Court of Appeal · 2014
- Aghaji v. Bank of America, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2016
- Ramos v. Brenntag Specialties, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2016
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.