Legal Opinion

Johnson v. United States Steel Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 1, 2015No. A142485PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

POLLAK, Acting P. J.

Plaintiffs David and Laura Johnson filed a products liability action against suppliers, manufacturers and retailers of various paints, adhesives, lubricants, solvents, and other products containing benzene. They contend that David’s chronic exposure as an auto mechanic to benzene-containing products led him to develop acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Among the defendants is United States Steel Corporation (U.S. Steel), which supplied a fabricator with a benzene-containing coal residue called “raffinate” that was once the principal ingredient in the fabrication of…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Barker v. Lull Engineering Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Soule v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Merrill v. Navegar, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Escola v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1944

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Acqua Vista Homeowners Assn. v. MWI, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2017
  2. Ramos v. Brenntag Specialties, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Chen v. L.A. Truck Centers, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  4. Kim v. Toyota Motor Corp., California Court of Appeal, 2nd District2016
  5. Hughes v. Apple, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2024

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API