Legal Opinion

State v. Talley

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1998No. 64893-0PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.

The primary issue presented by this appeal is whether a prosecutor who enters into a plea agreement that requires the State to recommend a standard range sentence, upon the defendant’s plea of guilty, breaches that agreement by participating in a court ordered evidentiary sentencing hearing. We hold that the prosecutor’s participation, by itself, does not undercut such a plea bargain and thereby violate the plea agreement. Consequently, we affirm the Court of Appeals’ decision to remand this case for an evidentiary hearing and resentencing before a judge other than the one who earlier imposed…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. State v. SledgeWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. WakefieldWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  4. In Re the Personal Restraint of PalodichukCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
  5. State v. CoppinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. State of Iowa v. Andrew James LopezSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
  2. State v. RamosWashington Supreme Court · 2017
  3. In re the Personal Restraint of BreedloveWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  4. In Re LordWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  5. In re the Personal Restraint of LordWashington Supreme Court · 2004

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API