State v. Talley
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.
The primary issue presented by this appeal is whether a prosecutor who enters into a plea agreement that requires the State to recommend a standard range sentence, upon the defendant’s plea of guilty, breaches that agreement by participating in a court ordered evidentiary sentencing hearing. We hold that the prosecutor’s participation, by itself, does not undercut such a plea bargain and thereby violate the plea agreement. Consequently, we affirm the Court of Appeals’ decision to remand this case for an evidentiary hearing and resentencing before a judge other than the one who earlier imposed…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State v. SledgeWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. WakefieldWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- In Re the Personal Restraint of PalodichukCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
- State v. CoppinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- State of Iowa v. Andrew James LopezSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
- State v. RamosWashington Supreme Court · 2017
- In re the Personal Restraint of BreedloveWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- In Re LordWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- In re the Personal Restraint of LordWashington Supreme Court · 2004
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.