Legal Opinion

State of Iowa v. Andrew James Lopez

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 4, 2015No. 14–0284PublishedCited by 128 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATERMAN, Justice.

Most criminal cases are resolved through guilty pleas resulting from plea bargains negotiated by defense counsel and the prosecution. 1 Our precedent makes clear that prosecutors are required to scrupulously honor the letter and spirit of plea agreements to maintain the integrity of the plea-bargaining process. We must determine whether the prosecutor in this case, who recited the plea agreement verbatim to recommend a deferred judgment and probation without mentioning tougher sentences, nevertheless breached that agreement by her actions at the sentencing hearing.…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Lafler v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  4. State v. GravesSupreme Court of Iowa · 2003
  5. United States v. BenchimolSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by128 opinions

  1. State of Iowa v. Christopher Clay McNealSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
  2. State of Iowa v. Andrew William SchlachterCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2016
  3. State of Iowa v. Iowa District Court for Jones CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
  4. State of Iowa v. Eric Devon BrownCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2018
  5. Alejandro Lira v. State of IowaCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2020

123 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API