Legal Opinion
City of West Haven v. Norback
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 22, 2003No. SC 16777PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
VERTEFEUILLE, J.
The plaintiff, the city of West Haven, appeals from the judgment of the trial court, rendered in accordance with the report of a judge trial referee (referee), awarding the named defendant,1 Bertha Norback, additional compensation for the taking of her real property by eminent domain. The plaintiff first contends that the trial court improperly accepted the referee’s report without conducting a plenary review of the referee’s findings pursuant to provisions of the *158General Statutes. The plaintiff also raises eight separate claims of impropriety with regard to the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- State v. CourchesneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Bridgeport Hospital v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- State v. VegaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Turgeon v. TurgeonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Texaco, Inc. v. GolartSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Glazer v. Dress Barn, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- City of Bristol v. Tilcon Minerals, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- State v. BonnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Connecticut Coalition Against Millstone v. Connecticut Siting CouncilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Northeast Ct. Economic Alliance, Inc. v. ATC PartnershipSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.