Legal Opinion

In re Mance

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 4, 2013No. Appellate Case No. 2013-000916; No. 27312Published

1Per curiam

By way of the attached opinion of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, respondent was suspended from the practice of law for six months following misconduct in three client matters. In re Manee, 35 A.3d 1125 (D.C.2012). The Maryland Court of Appeals subsequently imposed an indefinite *432suspension as reciprocal discipline against respondent.1 Attorney Grievance Comm’n of Md. v. Manee, 430 Md. 413, 61 A.3d 59 (2013). By letter dated February 6, 2013, respondent notified the Clerk of this Court of his suspensions in both jurisdictions.

The Clerk of this Court sent a letter via certified mail…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In the Matter of AckerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  2. In Re StraitSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  3. In Re CooperSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
  4. In re ManceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. ManceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API