Legal Opinion

DiMisa v. Acquaviva

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided May 16, 2008No. A-0993-06T3PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

947 A.2d 168 (2008)

400 N.J. Super. 307

Frank DiMISA, Judy Morris, Beth Thomas-Edwards, each individually and as partners and on behalf of 61 East Main St., a general partnership, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

Ronald ACQUAVIVA, R.E. Investors Ltd., Inc., and Christopher Acquaviva, Defendants-Respondents.

Docket No. A-0993-06T3.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Submitted November 28, 2007.

Decided May 16, 2008.

Blank Rome LLP, Cherry Hill, for appellants (John J. Pribish and Virginia G. White, of counsel and on the brief).

Rosner Nocera & Ragone, New York City, for respondents (Eliot L.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

State, Dept. of Environ. Protect. v. Ventron Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
State v. ReldanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
Trustees of the National Elevator Industry Pension, Health Benefit and Educational Funds v. Andrew LutykCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
In Re NilesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
In Re the Estate of VaydaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

DiMisa v. AcquavivaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2009
DiMisa v. AcquavivaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2009
In re Residential Capital, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2014