Legal Opinion

Trustees of the National Elevator Industry Pension, Health Benefit and Educational Funds v. Andrew Lutyk

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 11, 2003No. 01-2394PublishedCited by 103 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

SMITH, Circuit Judge.

On this appeal, the sole issue raised by defendant Andrew Lutyk is whether the record of a non-jury trial justified piercing the corporate veil of the American Elevator Company to impose personal liability on him as its sole shareholder for unpaid contributions the corporation owed to health, benefit, and pension funds established by a collective bargaining agreement. Because we believe that the District Court did not base its decision on clearly erroneous factual findings, we will affirm.

I

Defendant Andrew Lutyk was the president, sole director, and…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. United States v. BestfoodsSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Peacock v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. In the Matter of Multiponics, Incorporated, Bankrupt. MacHinery Rental, Inc. And Carl Biehl v. William W. Herpel, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by103 opinions

  1. Sharp v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
  2. Burtch v. Opus, LLC (In re Opus East, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2015
  3. Jurista v. Amerinox Processing, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2013
  4. Action Manufacturing Co. v. Simon Wrecking Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. Trinity Industries Inc v. Greenlease Holding CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018

98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API