DiMisa v. Acquaviva
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court 1
969 A.2d 1091 (2009)
198 N.J. 547
Frank DiMISA, Judy Morris, Beth Thomas-Edwards, each individually and as partners and on behalf of 61 East Main St., a general partnership, Plaintiffs-Respondents,
v.
Ronald ACQUAVIVA, Defendant, and
R.E. Investors Ltd., Inc. and Christopher Acquaviva, Defendants-Appellants.
A-35 September Term 2008
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued January 21, 2009.
Decided April 14, 2009.
Eliot L. Greenberg, New York City, argued the cause for appellants (Rosner Nocera & Ragone, attorneys).
John J. Pribish, Princeton, argued the cause for respondents (Blank Rome, attorneys).
2Opinion of the Court · LongJustice Long
At issue…
Also in this document: Dissent.
3Cases cited8 opinions
- State, Dept. of Environ. Protect. v. Ventron Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
- Right to Choose v. ByrneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
- Gerhardt v. Continental InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1966
- In Re Estate of LashSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
- Jugan v. FriedmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.