Legal Opinion

State, Dept. of Environ. Protect. v. Ventron Corp.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 21, 1983PublishedCited by 421 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

POLLOCK, J.

This appeal concerns the responsibility of various corporations for the cost of the cleanup and removal of mercury pollution seeping from a forty-acre tract of land into Berry’s Creek, a tidal estuary of the Hackensack River that flows through the Meadowlands. The plaintiff is the State of New Jersey, Department of Environmental Protection (DEP); the primary defendants are Velsicol Chemical Corporation (Velsicol), its former Subsidiary, Wood Ridge Chemical Corporation (Wood Ridge), and Ventrón Corporation (Ventrón), into which Wood Ridge was…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. United States Trust Co. of NY v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Rothman v. RothmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
  3. Right to Choose v. ByrneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  4. Gibbons v. GibbonsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  5. Berg v. Reaction Motors DivisionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by421 opinions

  1. The State of New York v. Shore Realty Corp. And Donald LeograndeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  2. Ayers v. Township of JacksonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  3. Pearson v. Component Technology CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
  4. Morton International, Inc. v. General Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
  5. State v. BeySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988

416 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API