Legal Opinion

In Re the Estate of Vayda

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 29, 2005PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rivera-Soto

This mil contest between estranged siblings requires that we address yet again whether, in the absence of a mandate based on a statute, court rule or contract, attorneys’ fees can be shifted from one party to another. Upon the application of the successful sibling, the trial court shifted that sibling’s attorneys’ fees to her brother, the executor and a co-beneficiary of the estate. The Appellate Division agreed that, under the circumstances, the successful sibling should be reimbursed for her attorneys’ fees, but that the reimbursement should come from the decedent’s estate and not from her…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State, Dept. of Environ. Protect. v. Ventron Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  2. Packard-Bamberger & Co., Inc. v. CollierSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
  3. North Bergen Rex Transport, Inc. v. Trailer Leasing Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
  4. Lieberman v. Employers Ins. of WausauSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  5. Saffer v. WilloughbySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of StockdaleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
  2. Innes Ex Rel. Innes v. Marzano-LesnevichSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2016
  3. Robert Occhifinto v. Olivo Construction Co., LLC (073174)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2015
  4. Imo the Estate of Adrian J. Folcher, Jr. (074590)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2016
  5. Rock Work, Inc. v. Pulaski Construction Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API