Legal Opinion

Graffell v. Honeysuckle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1948No. 30352PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.

Plaintiffs brought suit to recover treble damages for waste alleged to have been committed by defendants while in possession of plaintiffs’ real property under a written lease. Upon a trial without a jury, the court determined the amount of damages actually sustained by plaintiffs and entered judgment therefor, but refused to treble the amount. Because of such refusal, plaintiffs appealed.

The facts as found by the trial court and recited in its formal findings are as follows:

Appellants, Newton J. Graff ell and Edward D. Pitter, co-partners doing business under the name of Progressive…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lynch v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  2. In Re Phillips' EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  3. In Re LevyWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Sandahl v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Delano v. TennentWashington Supreme Court · 1926

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Childers v. ChildersWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Vita Food Products, Inc. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Fisher Properties, Inc. v. Arden-Mayfair, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Krystad v. LauWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  5. State v. EdwardsWashington Supreme Court · 1985

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API