Legal Opinion
Stanford v. Foamex L.P.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 24, 2009No. Civil Action No. 07-4225PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum
YOHN, District Judge.
Plaintiff William Stanford, Jr. filed this putative class action individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated persons and on behalf of the Foamex L.P. Savings Plan pursuant to Section 502(a)(2) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(2). His claims are lodged against Foamex L.P., Fidelity Management Trust Co., K. Douglas Ralph, Stephen Drap, Gregory J. Christian, and George L. Karpinski. Presently before the court is plaintiffs motion for class certification pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23.…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- In Re: The Prudential Insurance Company Of America Sales Practices LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Ortiz v. Fibreboard Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- 9 Fair empl.prac.cas. 211, 9 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 9931 Sandra Wetzel and Mari Ross, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Equal Opportunity Commission as Amicus Curiae v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- In re Chocolate Confectionary Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
- Board of Trustees of Aftra Retirement Fund v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Hochstadt v. Boston Scientific Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010
- Harris v. KoenigDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Williams v. City of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.