Interstate Commerce Commission v. All American Bus Lines, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
PATTERSON, District Judge.
The suit arises under the Motor Carrier Act of 1935, 49 U.S.C.A. § 301 et seq. The sections involved are 216(d), 217(b), and 222(b). By section 216(d), 49 U.S.C.A. § 316(d), it is made unlawful .for any common carrier by motor vehicle in interstate commerce to give any preference to any person; and by section 217(b), 49 U.S.C.A. § 317 (b), carriers are forbidden to charge, demand, collect, or receive any compensation for transportation different from the rates, fares, and charges -specified in its filed tariff. Section 222(b), 49 U.S.C.A. § 322(b), is to the effect…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. TorrCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
- United States v. Union Pac. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Utah · 1911
3Cited by6 opinions
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc.District Court, D. North Dakota · 1941
- Civil Aeronautics Board v. Modern Air Transport, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1949
- Bowles v. Swift & Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1944
- Civil Aeronautics Board v. Alitalia-Linee Aeree ItalianeDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1971
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1949
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.