Legal Opinion

Interstate Commerce Commission v. All American Bus Lines, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 2, 1937PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PATTERSON, District Judge.

The suit arises under the Motor Carrier Act of 1935, 49 U.S.C.A. § 301 et seq. The sections involved are 216(d), 217(b), and 222(b). By section 216(d), 49 U.S.C.A. § 316(d), it is made unlawful .for any common carrier by motor vehicle in interstate commerce to give any preference to any person; and by section 217(b), 49 U.S.C.A. § 317 (b), carriers are forbidden to charge, demand, collect, or receive any compensation for transportation different from the rates, fares, and charges -specified in its filed tariff. Section 222(b), 49 U.S.C.A. § 322(b), is to the effect…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Securities and Exchange Commission v. TorrCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
  3. Securities and Exchange Commission v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
  4. United States v. Union Pac. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Utah · 1911

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc.District Court, D. North Dakota · 1941
  2. Civil Aeronautics Board v. Modern Air Transport, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1949
  3. Bowles v. Swift & Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1944
  4. Civil Aeronautics Board v. Alitalia-Linee Aeree ItalianeDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1971
  5. Interstate Commerce Commission v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API