Legal Opinion

Bowles v. Swift & Co.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided July 31, 1944No. Civil Action No. 391PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEAHY, District Judge.

1. Defendant Swift & Co. is a processor in Delaware of large quantities of live poultry. OPA, after investigating one plant of Swift & Co., found defendant had purchased 403,487 pounds of poultry from January 21 to February 17, 1944, from certain “live poultry dealers” who, it is claimed, had purchased the birds from growers. The affidavits shows that the poultry was purchased at the farms of the growers, paid for at farm weights, and transferred to defendant’s plant, where the poultry was sold by the dealers to defendant at ceiling prices based on farm weights — at…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. HarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Securities and Exchange Commission v. TorrCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
  3. Bowles v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1944
  4. Henderson v. BurdCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
  5. American Fruit Growers, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Porter v. FiskeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  2. Lebaron v. Printing Specialties & Paper Converters Union, Local 388District Court, S.D. California · 1948
  3. Bowles v. SauerDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1947
  4. Porter v. ElliottDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1946
  5. United States v. Koch Bros. Bag Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API