Legal Opinion

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Jones

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 13, 1936No. 479PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Per curiam

The order appealed from denied appellant’s motion to vacate an injunction pendente lite, entered upon his consent; also to dismiss the bill of complaint, and to suppress evidence secured from appellant and to direct the appellee to return copies thereof now in its possession.

In view of the consent to the injunction pendente lite, the contention now raised, that it resulted from an illegal investigation, becomes immaterial.. The consent to the entry of the injunction waived any error of decision that might have been made. Swift & Co. v. United States, 276 U.S. 311, 48 S.Ct. 311, 72 L.Ed. 587.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Jones v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Cogen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  4. Jones v. Securities and Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
  5. In re BobCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Fleming v. Warshawsky & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941
  2. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Crude Oil Corp. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937
  3. Newfield v. RyanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937
  4. Douds v. Local 294, International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1947
  5. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1980

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API