Nemeth v. Trumbull
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtFriedman, J.
Defendant Arthur L. Trumbull appeals from a judgment taken against him and others after his default had been entered, Trumbull, Pankost, Blackburn and plaintiff Nemeth entered into a contract for the sale of land in which they had common interests and for a division of the profits by specified percentages. The land was sold. On December 30, 1960, Nemeth filed a complaint “for accounting, declaratory relief, and damages,” naming the other three parties as defendants. The complaint alleged that the property was sold to various purchasers; that defendant Pankost had collected payments from the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Burtnett v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Reed Orchard Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- Craft v. CraftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Gudarov v. HadjieffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Solot v. LinchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Rutan v. Summit Sports, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1985
- Brown v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Aheroni v. MaxwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Bristol Convalescent Hospital v. StoneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Weiss v. BlumencrancCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.