Legal Opinion

Gudarov v. Hadjieff

California Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1952No. L. A. 22095PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment rendered by the court against him, following the entry of his default. He contends that the judgment grants relief in excess of that demanded by the complaint, in violation of the provisions of section 580 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and, further, that the court erred in refusing to set aside the default. A hearing was granted by this court (on petition of the plaintiff), after decision by the District Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Three, for the purpose of giving further study to the problems presented. After such study we have…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Vaughn v. JonasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Burtnett v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Beard v. BeardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Brooks v. ForingtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Greenup v. RodmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Becker v. S.P v. Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Paularena v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. Stiles v. WallisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. Price v. HibbsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API