Aheroni v. Maxwell
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
*289Opinion
LILLIE, P. J.
Plaintiff appeals from order setting aside defendant’s default and the ensuing default judgment. Defendant cross-appeals from the judgment.1
Facts
Plaintiff sued defendant2 to recover attorney fees for legal services rendered by plaintiff to defendant at defendant’s request. Defendant filed an answer which he described as “tentative.” The court rejected that answer and on July 3, 1984, gave defendant 30 days to answer. On August 7 defendant applied ex parte for an order extending the time to answer. In his declaration in support of the application, defendant stated that…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Olson v. CoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Weitz v. YankoskyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Occidental Land, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- In Re Marriage of StevenotCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Rappleyea v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- City of Santa Monica v. StewartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Gibble v. Car-Lene Research, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- In Re Estate of BreardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Law Offices of Dixon R. Howell v. ValleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.