Legal Opinion

I-549 v. Missoula Irrigation District

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 2005No. 04-286PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cotter

¶1 The Missoula Irrigation District (“MID”) appeals from various Notices of Entry of Decrees Granting Exclusion from the MID for numerous petitioners, entered in the Fourth Judicial District Court. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

ISSUES

¶2 We restate the issues as follows:

¶3 1. Did the District Court deny the MID due process by granting petitions for exclusion from the MID based upon unsupported findings of fact submitted by the Standing Master?

¶4 2. Did the District Court have the authority to order the MID to reimburse back taxes?

*530¶5 3. Did the District Court abuse its discretion when…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hawkins v. HarneyMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Geil v. Missoula Irrigation DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  3. In Re the Adjudication of the Existing Water Rights of Clark Fork RiverMontana Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Geil v. Missoula Irrigation DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  5. RSG Holdings v. Missoula Irrigation DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Montanans for Justice: Vote No on CI-98 Not in Montana: Citizens Against CI-97 & Property Owners Against I-154 v. State Ex Rel. McGrathMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Larson v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Emanuel v. Great Falls School DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  4. In re the Marriage of TaylorMontana Supreme Court · 2016
  5. I-549 v. Missoula Irrigation DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API