In Re the Adjudication of the Existing Water Rights of Clark Fork River
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gray
This appeal arises from an order of the Water Court. The Water Court found that co-appellant City of Deer Lodge, predecessor in interest to co-appellants Evered and Ramona McQueary, abandoned through nonuse two water right claims in Cottonwood Creek, a tributary of the Clark Fork River. The Water Court ordered that the two water right claims shall not appear in the Preliminary or Final Decrees of the Clark Fork River Basin above the Blackfoot River (Basin 76G). We affirm.
The issue on appeal is whether the Water Court erred in finding that Deer Lodge abandoned the two water rights in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Interstate Production Credit Ass'n v. DesayeMontana Supreme Court · 1991
- McDonnell v. HuffineMontana Supreme Court · 1912
- Mildenberger v. GalbraithMontana Supreme Court · 1991
- Missoula Light & Water Co. v. HughesMontana Supreme Court · 1938
- Thomas v. BallMontana Supreme Court · 1923
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Skelton Ranch, Inc. v. Pondera County Canal & Reservoir Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2014
- Okanogan Wilderness League, Inc. v. Town of TwispWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Axtell v. M.S. ConsultingMontana Supreme Court · 1998
- In Re the Adjudication of the Existing Rights to the Use of All the Water, Both Surface & Underground Within the Clark Fork River Drainage Area Above the Blackfoot RiverMontana Supreme Court · 1995
- I-549 v. Missoula Irrigation DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.