Legal Opinion

Geil v. Missoula Irrigation District

Montana Supreme Court

Decided August 17, 2004No. 03-664PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Regnier

¶1 The Missoula Irrigation District (MID) appeals from the Notice of Entry of a Decree Granting Exclusion from the MID for numerous Petitioners entered by the Fourth Judicial District Court. We affirm in part and reverse in part. MID raises the following issues on appeal:

¶2 1. Did the District Court deny MID due process by making findings of fact without hearing and without evidence in the record?

¶3 2. Did the District Court have any authority to order MID to reimburse taxes paid without protest by Petitioners?

¶4 3. Did the District Court abuse its discretion when it denied MID’s motion to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Loomis v. LuraskiMontana Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Geil v. Missoula Irrigation DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Maddox v. NormanMontana Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Dukes v. Sirius Construction, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Small v. GoodMontana Supreme Court · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Farrier v. Teacher's Retirement BoardMontana Supreme Court · 2005
  2. I-549 v. Missoula Irrigation DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Larango v. Missoula Irrigation DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Watchtower v. 20th Judicial DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 2021
  5. Watchtower v. 20th Judicial DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API