Legal Opinion

RSG Holdings v. Missoula Irrigation District

Montana Supreme Court

Decided August 17, 2004No. 03-634PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Regnier

¶1 The Missoula Irrigation District (MID) appeals from the Notice of Entry of a Decree Granting Exclusion from the MID for numerous Petitioners entered by the Fourth Judicial District Cotut. We affirm in part and reverse in part. MID raises the following issues on appeal:

¶2 1. Did the District Court deny MID due process by making findings of fact without hearing and without evidence in the record?

¶3 2. Did the District Court have any authority to order MID to reimburse taxes paid without protest by RSG Holdings?

¶4 3. Did the District Court abuse its discretion when it denied MID’s motion to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Loomis v. LuraskiMontana Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Geil v. Missoula Irrigation DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Dukes v. Sirius Construction, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Seubert v. SeubertMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Small v. GoodMontana Supreme Court · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. DeWittMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Rolison v. Bozeman Deaconess Health Services, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2005
  3. I-549 v. Missoula Irrigation DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Cascade Co. v. Petroleum TankMontana Supreme Court · 2022
  5. I-549 v. Missoula Irrigation DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API