Geil v. Missoula Irrigation District
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Leaphart
*323¶1 The Missoula Irrigation District (MID) appeals from the Fourth Judicial District Court’s final order excluding Helen Geil-Hoeg’s property from the MID. We affirm.
¶2 We re-state the issues on appeal as follows:
¶3 (1) Does the MID have standing to challenge the constitutionality of §§ 85-7-1802(2) and 85-7-1846, MCA (1997)?
¶4 (2) Does Senate Bill 284, codified as § 85-7-1802(2), MCA (1997), deny equal protection under the law?
¶5 (3) Do §§ 85-7-1802(2) and 85-7-1846, MCA (1997), deny due process of the law?
¶6 (4) Does the doctrine of res judicata prohibit the exclusion of land from the MID?
FAC…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- West Coast Hotel Co. v. ParrishSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Gryczan v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1997
- Stratemeyer v. Lincoln CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1993
- Small v. McRaeMontana Supreme Court · 1982
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Heffernan v. Missoula City CouncilMontana Supreme Court · 2011
- Montanans for Justice: Vote No on CI-98 Not in Montana: Citizens Against CI-97 & Property Owners Against I-154 v. State Ex Rel. McGrathMontana Supreme Court · 2006
- Larson v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2019
- Kottel v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2002
- Reesor v. Montana State FundMontana Supreme Court · 2004
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.