Legal Opinion

Berry v. Berry

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 26, 2005No. AC 25135PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LAVERY, C. J.

The defendant, Pamela S. Berry, appeals from the trial court’s judgment denying her motions for modification of alimony and for attorney’s fees. On appeal, she claims that the court (1) relied on outdated case law, (2) made erroneous factual findings, (3) improperly concluded that her changed circumstances did not warrant an upward modification in her alimony award and (4) improperly denied her motion for attorney’s fees. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

This case arises from the dissolution of the parties’ twenty-one year marriage on January 5, 1998. As part of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Darak v. DarakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. Borkowski v. BorkowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  3. Hardisty v. HardistySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  4. McGuinness v. McGuinnessSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  5. LaBow v. LaBowConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Tracey v. TraceyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  2. Regan v. ReganConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  3. Adams v. AdamsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  4. Cannon v. CannonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  5. Racsko v. RacskoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API