Tefal, S.A. And Royal Chambord, Inc. v. Products International Company, a Partnership Also Known as Picam Products and as Prescott Adams & Nolan
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SEITZ, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs are Tefal, S.A., a French corporation and Royal Chambord, a New Jersey corporation with its corporate headquarters in that state. Tefal is the registered owner of the United States trademark “T — FAL” for kitchen and cooking utensils. Plaintiff, Royal Cham-bord, is the sole United States distributor of Tefal products. The defendants are Products International Company (Pi-cam), a partnership of two California corporations, the individual corporations comprising the partnership and Bernard Lavitch, the General Manager of Picam. Plaintiffs sued…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Vanity Fair Mills, Inc. v. The T. Eaton Co. Limited and John David EatonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Honda Associates, Inc. v. Nozawa Trading, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1974
- Murray Hill Restaurant, Inc. v. Thirteen Twenty One Locust, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1938
- Scott Paper Company v. Scott's Liquid Gold, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1974
- Geo. Washington Mint, Inc. v. Washington Mint, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1972
3Cited by74 opinions
- Zippo Manufacturing Co. v. Zippo Dot Com, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
- Beverly Hills Fan Company v. Royal Sovereign Corp. And Ultec Enterprises Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Cottman Transmission Systems, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation v. Leonardo Martino and Trans One Ii, Inc., a Michigan CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Dakota Industries, Inc. v. Dakota Sportswear, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- Licciardello v. LoveladyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.