Legal Opinion

Licciardello v. Lovelady

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided October 10, 2008No. 07-14086PublishedCited by 195 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Circuit Judge:

Carman Licciardello brought this action in the Middle District of Florida against Rendy Lovelady under the Lanham Act for trademark infringement and related claims arising out of Lovelady’s allegedly unauthorized use of Licciardello’s name, photograph, and apparent endorsement of Lovelady on a website. Lovelady, who resides in Tennessee, filed a Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction, which the district court granted. Licciar-dello filed a timely notice of appeal. For the following reasons, we shall reverse.

I

Carman Licciardello (“Carman”) has been a…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by195 opinions

  1. Chloé v. Queen Bee of Beverly Hills, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
  2. Louis Vuitton Malletier, S.A. v. Joseph MosseriCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
  3. Old Republic Insurance Co. v. Continental Motors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
  4. Axa Equitable Life Insurance v. Infinity Financial Group, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2009
  5. Washington Shoe Company v. A-Z Sporting Goods IncCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012

190 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API