Legal Opinion
Bryson v. Newtown Real Estate & Development Corp.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 30, 1965PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCotter, J.
The plaintiff took a first mortgage from the named defendant, hereinafter referred to as the corporation, on four contiguous tracts of land, hereinafter referred to as parcel A. The defendant Paul Pellegrino was subsequently given a mortgage by the corporation on one of these four tracts, hereinafter referred to as parcel B. After the Pellegrino mortgage was given and recorded, the corporation granted a mortgage on parcel A to the defendant Edward M. Derman. All three mortgages were properly executed by the corporation and were recorded in the order given.
"When the corporation subsequently…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Markey v. LangleySupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Desiderio v. IadonisiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- Savings Bank v. CreswellSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Beach v. IsacsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- Cronin v. Gager-Crawford Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- New Milford Savings Bank v. JajerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Northeast Savings v. HintlianSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Hudson Valley Bank v. KisselSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
- In Re FoxUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 2006
- Danbury Savings & Loan Ass'n v. HoviConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.