Legal Opinion
Northeast Savings v. Hintlian
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 3, 1997No. SC 15536PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PALMER, J.
The sole issue raised by this appeal is whether General Statutes § 49-25,1 which establishes *271procedures relative to the appraisal of property for which a judgment of foreclosure by sale has been rendered, violates the due process clauses of the federal and state constitutions.2 The trial court rendered a judgment of foreclosure by sale of certain real property owned by the defendants Sirvart K. Hintlian and John Hintlian (defendants)3 and, as required by § 49-25, appointed a person to conduct the sale and an appraiser to appraise the property. Before the sale was conducted,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Iowa Central Railway Co. v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Hartford Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. TuckerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Fleming v. GarnettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Society for Savings v. Chestnut Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- New England Savings Bank v. LopezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. AustinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Monetary Funding Group, Inc. v. PluchinoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- First Connecticut Capital, LLC v. Homes of Westport, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- AvalonBay Communities, Inc. v. Sewer CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- First National Bank of Chicago v. MaynardConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.