Tindal v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority

BROSKY, Judge:

This appeal is from the judgment entered on molded verdicts awarded in favor of appellees, Carl Rollins (hereinafter, “Rollins”), and Delores Rollins (hereinafter, “Mrs. Rollins”), and against appellants, Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (hereinafter, “SEPTA”), and Robert Addison (hereinafter, “Addison”), and William Tindal, Jr. (hereinafter, “Tindal”).1 Appellants raise two interrelated issues before the court en banc. The first is whether they have a due process right to an evidentiary hearing to determine their responsibility for the payment of delay…