Legal Opinion

Charles Francisco Cecilia Francisco v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided October 1, 2001No. 00-1802PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

AMBRO, Circuit Judge.

This tax case presents two questions. First, are “delay damages,” received by the plaintiff in a personal injury tort action pursuant to Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 238, exempt from federal income taxation as damages “received on account of’ a personal injury? 26 U.S.C. § 104(a)(2). Second, if delay damages are taxable, how should their amount be determined when the plaintiff has agreed to a post-verdict settlement that fails to allocate the recovery between compensation for the injury and delay damages?

We hold that the personal injury…

2Cases cited69 opinions

  1. Helvering v. CliffordSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. United States v. JanisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. United States v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Lyeth v. HoeySupreme Court of the United States · 1938

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Green v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
  2. Gerstenbluth v. Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  3. Chamberlain Ex Rel. Chamberlain v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
  4. University of Pittsburgh v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  5. Harrison v. LaursenCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2003

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API