Bloomingdale v. Cushman
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Bamsey county to recover $6,506.19 upon three promissory notes. The case was tried before Brill, J., who, at the close of the testimony, directed a verdict in favor of defendant. From an order denying their motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial, plaintiffs appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
Taylor, C.
Plaintiffs have a department store in the city of New York, and have a banking department therein, in which they carry on the business of private bankers and buy and discount commercial paper. On January *44726, 1914, Isaacs Brothers, clothing manufacturers in that city, sold them four notes, dated January 15, 1914, payable one in March, one in April, one in May, and one in June, 1914, purporting to have been executed by the Knox-Burchard Mercantile Company of St. Paul, Minnesota, and which the vendors claimed to have received for merchandise sold by them to the St. Paul company.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People's Bank v. St. Anthony's Roman Catholic ChurchNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Dispatch Printing Co. v. National Bank of CommerceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Star Mills v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
- Columbia Mill Co. v. National Bank of CommerceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- City Electric Street Railway Co. v. First National Exchange BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1896
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Koivisto v. Bankers & Merchants Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- Edward R. Kenneally, Trustee of Reed Plumbing, Heating and Air-Conditioning, Inc. v. First National Bank of AnokaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1969
- Eberlein v. Stockyards Mortgage & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Powell v. MVE Holdings, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- Schauble v. HeddingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.